. GMAT

 GRE Home

GMAT home

order page 
I. Six Principles for Critical Reasoning Questions   
wA. Learn how to identify arguments
wB. Types of arguments
wC. Putting it into your own words
wD. Evaluate an argument
wE. Evaluate an argument's strength and validity
wF. Get an idea of the right answer

II. Typical Critical Reasoning Question Types
wA. Must Be True Questions
wB. Assumption Questions
wC. Strengthen and Weaken Questions
wD. Main Point Questions
wF. Reasoning Questions

 

C. Putting it into your own words


Now that you know how to break down arguments into premises and conclusions, you are able to translate a passage into your own words.

     
Each question is divided into two parts: the stimulus (the first part of the question that usually consists of an argument) and the stem, which asks a questions such as, "which of the following is an assumption of the paragraph above?"  When you finish reading the stimulus, try to summarize in your mind what the argument in the stimulus is about (premises, conclusions, and assumptions). Most of the stimulus parts of the questions have a flaw that you can readily identify, such as a flawed assumption. When you put the argument in your own words, you can usually identify what the stem will ask before you even get to it. This process helps you identify the meaning of the stimulus. Usually the stimulus describes something very simple in a complicated manner, and putting it in your own words helps you to get a handle on what the passage means.

Apartment building owners argue that rent control should be abolished. Although they acknowledge that they would increase rents in the short term, owners argue that in the long term the rent increases would lead to greater profitability. Higher profits would lead to increased apartment construction. Increased apartment construction would then lead to a greater supply of residences and lower prices as the potential apartment residents have a better selection. Thus, abolishing rent control would ultimately reduce prices.

     Try to express that complicated argument in your own words? Simple. Abolishing rent control will increase the supply of housing (premise); greater supply leads to lower prices (premise); and thus abolishing rent control leads to lower rents (conclusion). It is a supply/demand argument.

Once you put it into your own terms, the question becomes much easier to understand.

w D. Evaluate an argument





If you have any more questions or suggestions, email 24hourtutor@800score.com

<< go back to table of contents